The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Analyse meeting papers and other information prior to meetings
|
|
Available information is assessed for key points, assumptions and recommendations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Questions to clarify critical information and advice are developed in readiness for meetings. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Additional specialist advice is sought, where necessary. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Viewpoints expressed by all stakeholders and other organisations are interpreted from a broad industry perspective. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prepare realistic positions and supporting arguments in advance
|
|
The implications of the available information and any proposed strategies for the participant's sector are assessed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The likely expectations and points of negotiation of other participants are determined. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Logical and balanced conclusions are drawn from the available information. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Practical and sustainable resource managementoptions are planned from a broad industry perspective. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Propose strategic approaches to resource management
|
|
Input to management plans is constructive and sympathetic to the interests of all stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The uncertainty and lack of precision of scientific and other information are appreciated and reflected in the selection of management strategies. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Performance indicators are proposed for preferred options that are consistent with the interest of the broad range of ecosystem users. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analyse meeting papers and other information prior to meetings
|
|
Available information is assessed for key points, assumptions and recommendations. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Questions to clarify critical information and advice are developed in readiness for meetings. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Additional specialist advice is sought, where necessary. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Viewpoints expressed by all stakeholders and other organisations are interpreted from a broad industry perspective. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prepare realistic positions and supporting arguments in advance
|
|
The implications of the available information and any proposed strategies for the participant's sector are assessed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The likely expectations and points of negotiation of other participants are determined. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Logical and balanced conclusions are drawn from the available information. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Practical and sustainable resource managementoptions are planned from a broad industry perspective. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Propose strategic approaches to resource management
|
|
Input to management plans is constructive and sympathetic to the interests of all stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The uncertainty and lack of precision of scientific and other information are appreciated and reflected in the selection of management strategies. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Performance indicators are proposed for preferred options that are consistent with the interest of the broad range of ecosystem users. Completed |
Evidence:
|